Many procurement leaders reach a point where they’re ready to move on from their current custom label manufacturer. Whether they succeed in making that case with their internal decision-makers may come down to one question: Do they lead with their frustration, or do they lay out a documented pattern?
If you’re in the thick of trying to make a business case for changing your label vendor, this blog can help by walking you through four steps:
Notably, the custom label printing industry has recently gone through a wave of consolidation, with private equity buying up smaller, family-run printers that built their name on close relationships. Those relationships don’t always survive the acquisition, and companies on the other end may start noticing slower responses with no explanation. That’s a vendor relationship management problem as much as a performance one.
There’s also a raw-materials issue that can impact the whole industry at once. Much of the paper, film, and adhesive label printers use comes from a relatively small group of major material manufacturers. When one of them has a problem, every printer downstream feels it.
Be aware that switching vendors won’t fix an industry-wide problem, and a trustworthy prospective vendor will tell you so up front. On the other hand, if what you’re experiencing is a service or quality issue specific to your current vendor, that’s a different conversation.
Start by figuring out whether the missed dates come from a capacity crunch, a post-acquisition shakeup, or a material shortage every printer is dealing with right now. You’re looking for a pattern of shifting ship dates with no explanation versus just one missed date.
A big red flag is a vendor who keeps handing you new ship dates without explaining why the last one was missed. A good vendor is transparent about what’s happening, including industry-wide issues, and lays out your options, such as moving to another material supplier. If you’re getting neither an explanation nor options, it’s likely time to consider making a case to switch.
One-off defects happen everywhere. But how these issues are addressed is what matters. If the same problem, such as color drift between runs or labels lifting on the line, keeps showing up after it was supposed to be fixed, you should be concerned.
Another cause for concern is if your current label manufacturer isn’t ISO 9001 certified (or, minimally, following another proven and robust quality management system) to provide for an effective corrective-action process.
It’s helpful to maintain a log of any discussions you’ve had with your current vendor about these problems, and how they responded. When you present your business case to your leadership team, they may ask whether the vendor had a chance to fix the problem. This log will proactively answer that question and ensure you can focus on the change you want to make.
Once you’ve confirmed and documented the nature of the problem, it’s time to put a number on it.
Those frustrations may be real, and for some buyers they’re enough to prompt a change on their own. In many organizations, though, frustration alone isn’t enough to warrant a change, since leadership tends to hear it as an inconvenience for procurement and not a problem for the business. Instead, you need to look at the broader impact the vendor has on the business.
You can often make a stronger business case for change by focusing on the cost of not making a change. Start by tallying the costs tied to the vendor-specific problems you confirmed in Step 1:
These all reflect real business costs, and that tells a much stronger story. Aggregate these costs over time and project them out over one month, one quarter, and one year. That data is more likely to catch leadership’s attention.
Separately, it’s worth checking that you’re not simply overpaying today, whichever vendor you use.
Strong custom label manufacturers share a few things in common, and most of them are easy to check before you commit. Whichever vendor you choose, at a minimum make sure they meet these four supplier evaluation criteria:
None of this is meant to be a gotcha list, but it will help you distinguish between a vendor who can talk a good game from one who can actually deliver.
Once you’ve found a vendor clears those four checks, you have what you need to make a case for change.
That last point is important, because small tests are also a smaller ask and easier for leadership to agree to. Trial runs help establish proof that the proposed new vendor is a smarter choice.
It’s also possible you may not want to cut all ties with your existing supplier, in which case a second-source arrangement may be what you need. For example, you may be concerned about having your entire label supply resting on a single vendor, you may want access to more sustainable label materials that your current vendor doesn’t offer, or perhaps your current vendor handles today’s needs well, but you need a specialist for certain labels with specific certification requirements.
Ultimately, the point here is that switching labeling suppliers on a whim is rarely a good idea. But by doing your homework in a clear and intentional way, you can build a solid business case for change that your leadership will take seriously.