If you’ve just been handed label sourcing for the first time, you might assume switching custom label manufacturers works like switching any other supplier: Get a few quotes, pick the best price, and move on. It’s an easy assumption to make, and it rarely holds up once the transition actually starts.
Switching custom label manufacturers involves more than sending your artwork to someone new. Vendor qualification, tooling, material testing, and packaging requirements can all complicate the transition if they aren’t identified upfront.
This does not mean switching is a bad idea. Knowing everything that’s actually involved, beyond what it costs, is what turns switching vendors from a guess into a decision you can walk into with confidence.
Here’s what each of those looks like once you’re actually in the process, starting with what to confirm once you’ve decided to make the switch.
Many buyers reach this point having already confirmed a real supplier reliability problem, whether that’s repeated delays, unresolved quality issues, or quotes that take too long to turn around. That’s not unusual right now: label industry consolidation closed roughly 50 deals in 2025 alone, a 16% jump over the year before, and vendors caught up in that churn don’t always hold their service levels. If you’ve already made that case to leadership, the next question is what the transition itself actually involves: the process, the costs, and the details that are easy to overlook. Not knowing can be its own source of stress, and that’s exactly what this piece is here to help with.
Before you move forward, it’s worth confirming where the pressure is actually coming from. If rising costs or longer lead times are pushing you toward a switch, find out whether the problem is specific to your current vendor or part of a broader trend. Tariffs and raw material costs shift regardless of who prints your labels, so that context matters before you conclude a new vendor is the fix.
Most transitions start with supplier self-assessment forms covering general business information, lead times, capacity, capabilities, facility and equipment details, and certifications. It can feel like a lot of paperwork for something as small as a label, but it’s what keeps both sides from getting surprised later.
On-site audits often follow, covering quality, environmental, and regulatory assessments. This is usually how a vendor ends up on your company’s approved vendor list. It doesn’t happen automatically.
The cost here is mostly time, but it’s real, so build it into your transition timeline from the start.
Artwork files matter as much as the physical tooling. Confirm you own your current files and can access them easily, then ask a prospective vendor about their file-acceptance requirements. Any roadblocks to transfer are worth surfacing at quoting, before you’ve committed.
Even when you own your plates and tooling, it rarely transfers equitably between vendors. Equipment, process, and layout differences usually get in the way.
Color setup can add another layer: spot-color plates and Pantone matches from your old vendor may not carry over cleanly to a new vendor, so confirm how they handle color matching before you commit.
New tooling cost can be significant for a large SKU portfolio, and it’s normal for that number to feel like sticker shock at first. Some vendors will consider offsetting part of that cost depending on volume and circumstances, though that decision is made case by case. Ask directly what a vendor is willing to offset. You won’t know until you ask.
Material testing should happen under real application and end-use conditions, since lab conditions alone won’t catch everything. It takes a bit more patience upfront, but that’s exactly the step that gets skipped right before a label fails somewhere you weren’t watching for it.
Discuss how to offset trial run costs with a potential new vendor. If you’re willing to pay for those costs upfront, ask whether the vendor will credit them back to you if they’re awarded the business.
Requesting the exact named material specification, meaning the specific construction of face stock, adhesive, and liner, can help you avoid a full material re-test cycle.
More vendors in an RFQ don’t necessarily mean better pricing. Suppliers may be more willing to sharpen their price when they know they’re part of a carefully selected group with a realistic chance of winning the business. Buried in a stack of 40 quotes, that same supplier has little reason to offer their best price.
Even after the label itself checks out, a few requirements outside the label spec can still catch you off guard.
The label spec is only part of what a new vendor needs to know. Carton weight limits, routing guide requirements, and similar logistics details often only surface after something ships wrong.
These get missed because they don’t feel like part of the label. But a vendor who doesn’t ask about them upfront can create friction with receiving, warehouse, or accounting, even when the label itself is exactly right.
Building a transfer checklist that covers more than the label spec keeps this from becoming a cost of switching that you didn’t plan for.
None of this is an argument against switching vendors. Switching can be highly beneficial for your brand under the right circumstances. It’s the difference between an unpleasant surprise mid-transition and a decision backed by real numbers.
A vendor who raises these costs and questions upfront is showing you they’re planning for a long relationship built on custom label printing services.